1974
Avocadometer: 65%
Reviews Counted: 100
Ripe for Tacos: 82 | Ready for the Compost: 18
The plot of the movie was rather true to the book. Events mirrored the book so well, I believe to a fault. The movie tried to have quotes and exact scenes from the book at every change of the scene. They did every given scene well, but sometimes the quotes Fitzgerald gives us don't totally fit the scene of a movie, and that awkwardness was evident. Major plot elements such as Gatsby's extravagant parties, Tom and Myrtle's relationship, Jordan being an item with Nick, and Gatsby pursuing and making love to Daisy, Myrtle getting hit by the car driven by Daisy, Wilson shooting Gatsby and himself, and Nick heading up the funeral were all mirrored by the movie.
The main actors were Daisy Buchanan, Tom Buchanan, Jordan Baker, Nick Carraway, and Jay Gatsby. I believe Jordan was the only character represented in the correct fashion as described in Fitzgerald's book. Daisy seemed so much more ditsy and air headed than I expected her from the book. I expected her to be prettier, less interested in money, and certainly a brunette, as Fitzgerald made her. I was under the impression from the book that Tom would be your massive, hulking NFL football player that is large, as well as tall. I certainly did not expect him to look like a creeper. Anyone with only a bottom half of a mustache sends up my creeper red flag! He seemed somewhat awkward with his large height, in contrast to the book. Jordan was played very well. She seemed to like and be with Nick just as much as in the book and just as attractive, yet just as deceptive. Nick was just too awkward in the movie! I thought he was going to be this fun, hard-working younger guy who gets caught up in all the riches, but he turned out to be out-of-place and never genuine in his words or actions. For example, in the movie, when he makes his final comment to Gatsby, there was just not the genuineness behind it. Gatsby seemed too young. I know he was about the same age as Nick, but regardless seemed out of place to have all his money at that age. I also expected him more mysterious and secretive than he was in the movie. In the movie, he seemed so much more forward and made calculated moves. His suits definitely stayed true from book to movie.
The cinematography is my main factor for dropping the Avocadometer from a high eighties score. There are so many dang awkward scenes. The camera is held for too long on some scenes and not long enough in others. Many instances put the camera on a scene that conveys little to no interest, except maybe some scenery. More songs need to be incorporated into the movie to acquire different moods. One song was repeatedly played as a theme song for everything.
The importance of geography, a recurring motif of the book, was barely noticeable in the movie. East Egg and West Egg had few noticeable differences, even to someone who knows the book well. The Valley of Ashes was portrayed a little better. It was easier to recognize that it is an intermediary point between the two eggs. This valley was depicted full of ashes very well. The two eggs: nothing. I couldn't tell a difference in coastlines, dress of people, anything!
The most correlating item to the perception the book creates is the great replication of materials from the "Roaring Twenties" era. The cars, gas pumps, cigarette holders, prominence of smoking, and clothing illustrated a great representation of the era! The 20's Flapper Style...classic.
All the women in the movie followed this crazy style, as illustrated on the left. The men wore suits nearly all the time. I personally am not finding this Flapper style attractive, but hey I'm in 2011! At that time, it sure must have been pretty!Captain Morgan
Top Critic
In Theatres: a long time ago.
Genre: drama, romantic comedy, yes comedy.
Directed By: someone okay with awkward silences.
Rated: G, totally Great for anyone to watch.
Written By: Scott F. Fitzgerald.
URL for the picture: http://aubreylondonpinup.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/flappermmmmmm.jpg